Love Your School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
845012487
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Phone
4806128784
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$663,319
Expenses
$419,670
Assets
$443,534
Liabilities
$5,669

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNY CLARK (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNY CLARK (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $116,590 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to help families explore and access the many education options available, and celebrate each one through creative storytelling, relevant and fun resources, and practical support so every family can love their school.

What it reported doing in 2025

Parent concierge service is our direct 1:1 parent support, ensuring parents have a trusted guide to help them navigate their child's k-12 education journey in Arizona, Alabama, and West Virginia. In 2025, love your school's parent concierge service had 1.586 million engagements and connections with users in Arizona, Alabama, and West Virginia. These users were connected to our education resources on our website, social media, and podcast. The parent concierge service helped 17,957 families (averaging 52 parents a day!) navigate their education options, special education services, and scholarship opportunities such as education savings accounts and tax-credit scholarships. The parent concierge service solved 14,298 unique concerns for parents (averaging 42 per day!). The parent concierge service advocated for parents - through 79 collaboration and advocacy meetings and held 52 speaking, virtual, and in-person community events for parents in Arizona, Alabama, and West Virginia to get connected to their education options.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.5%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $31.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.7%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.5% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $335K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.