Love Your Melon Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464140899
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6128019112
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $734,879
- Expenses
- $889,637
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Zachary Quinn (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Zachary Quinn (President): $63,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educational: To instruct the public and raise awareness for childhood cancers. This includes supporting childhood cancer research, providing relief to children with cancer, and instilling importance of finding a cure.Charitable: To improve the quality of life for children battling cancer. This may involve providing small gifts (such as a hat to a child that has lost their hair), life changing adventures, and/or memorable moments when they are needed the most. Lessening the burdens of government by strengthening families and lifting up communities.
What it reported doing in 2015
Love Your Melon Foundation improved the lives of children battling cancer on a nationwide basis. The organization's Adventures and Ambassador Program spanned 80 different colleges and included over 1,000 college students in 2015, empowering Love Your Melon to personally deliver over 15,000 free hats to kids in children's hospitals, Ronald McDonald Houses, camps, and households, as well as provide over 60 therapeutic adventures (helicopter flights, plane flights, racecar drives, boat rides and superhero days) to children needing it most.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.3 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.6%; rating input score 96; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 96.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 38.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $774K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $63K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.