Louisville Youth Philanthropy Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
872576565
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Prospect, KY, USA
Phone
5026760281
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$145,644
Expenses
$149,480
Assets
$171,445
Liabilities
$1,966

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CLAIRE ARNOLD (BOARD MEMBER)
  • NICOLE DIEBOLD (BOARD MEMBER)
  • CHRISTINE KELLY (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The louisville youth philanthropy council (lypc) seeks to educate youth about philanthropy, inspiring them through hands-on experiences to become community leaders.

What it reported doing in 2024

Lypc is a 16-week course that meets for 3 hours on saturday afternoons from august through march. The focus is experiential learning; the students serve as members of a grant-making board for each of their teams. The teams develop their own missions, research organizations that could fulfill their missions, interview organizational representatives, go on site visits and create proposal selection criteria to allow them to determine as a team how to grant $5,000. Each team has a dedicated facilitator, but they only provide guidance. The students make all of the decisions. Students who apply and are accepted into the lypc program attend the 16 classes at no charge to them.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.8%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 41.4%; rating input score 41

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 51.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.8% of revenue deployed · 41.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.