Louisville Professional Firefighters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 616030837
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Louisville, KY, USA
- Phone
- 5023665227
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $721,100
- Expenses
- $696,737
- Assets
- $746,881
- Liabilities
- $42,170
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFF TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
- DENNIS EGGEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFF TAYLOR (PRESIDENT): $42,156 total reported compensation
- DENNIS EGGEN (VICE PRESIDENT): $34,215 total reported compensation
- NICHOLAS GROFT (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $34,215 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To elevate firefighting as a profession and support its members and local charities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Louisville firefighters association organized to elevate firefighting as a profession and support its members as well as local charities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 54
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.8%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 60.9%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 45.7%; rating input score 46; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 84.2%; rating input score 84; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.9%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.8% of revenue deployed · 60.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 19 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $424K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 27 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 46/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX Occupancy column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.