Louisiana Realtors Association Relief Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203385877
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Phone
2259232210
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,399
Expenses
$56,682
Assets
$344,563
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TONY CORNNER (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • CINDY DYER (PRESIDENT)
  • RHONDA REAP-CURIEL (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • NORMAN MORRIS (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • KYRA TRICHE (DIRECTOR)
  • TONY CORNNER (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • CINDY DYER (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Louisiana realtors relief fund was established in 2005 as a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation dedicated to providing financial assistance to realtor members and the consumers they serve in times of natural or man-made disasters. The funds delivered ensure that property owners can once again enjoy the pride of home ownership. Realtors are able to practice their trade while communities are revitalized and strengthened.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided various disaster relief assistance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -357.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.08; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.