Louisiana Crawfish Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990767573
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Eunice, LA, USA
Phone
3375801615
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,710
Expenses
$14,058
Assets
$68,815

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOUG GUILLORY (President)
  • JOSEPH EARL TOUPS (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DOUG GUILLORY (President)
  • JOSEPH EARL TOUPS (Vice President)
  • KODY RHEINHARD BIEBER (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Development, advancement and encouragement of crawfish farming and processing and all of the products and by-products thereof in the united states, and all activities complementary or incidental thereto, and the promotion of the welfare thereof in every sense-agricultural, mechanical, scientific, financial, commercial, politico-economic and social, through publication and all other legitimate means.

What it reported doing in 2025

Formation-Louisiana crawfish association was formed in 2024 with the intention of serving the local and regional communities through the development, advancement, and encouragement of crawfish farming and processing. Registrations were filed for all applicable business licenses, federal identification numbers, and applicable compliance related documents. By laws and articles of incorporation were drafted to assist in identifying the mission and purpose of the organization while outlining operational procedures that will ensure that the mission is executed properly. Directors were elected to lead the organization's operations and execute the mission of the organization and it's members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 83.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.9; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 199.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 100.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.