Louisiana Coalition for Access to Autism Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814446058
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Phone
5043213268
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$93,855
Expenses
$91,212
Assets
$10,830
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BEVERLY HAYDEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ADDIE ANDRUS (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BEVERLY HAYDEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KEVIN SILVER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • GRANT GAUTREAUX (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To study the policy implications of laws affecting the provision of services relating to autism; to help preserve access to quality autism services in Louisiana.

What it reported doing in 2024

Lcaas works year-round to build awareness about its mission of improving access to autism services, expand the reach of the coalition through new members, and to build relationships with policymakers and lawmakers. Lcaas also responds quickly to issues that arise which may create barriers to access. Lcaas receives input from its members and external stakeholders as appropriate and takes steps to address the barriers to access.through education and outreach to local and state officials and lawmakers, lcaas works to build awareness about the benefits of autism therapy services and the need for sustainable funding to protect and improve access to autism therapy services for families coping with asd.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 48.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.