Louisiana Bucket Brigade

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
721488935
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
New Orleans, LA, USA
Phone
5044843433
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Quality, Protection, and Beautification N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,293,989
Expenses
$2,602,429
Assets
$6,220,167
Liabilities
$585,863

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNE ROLFES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANNE ROLFES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $169,395 total reported compensation
  • LISA FLANAGAN (CHAIR): $10,775 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support communities use of grassroots action in order to create sustainable neighborhoods free from industrial pollution.

What it reported doing in 2024

Movement building: down by the river bike ride - the goal for our bike ride is to build inspiration and power by bringing the power of history to todays environmental justice movement along cancer alley. Our strategy is to get people out into the communities and landscapes where petrochemical facilities are located so they can see the scale of the plants, their proximity and their impact on neighboring residents firsthand. By exploring the confluence of black history in the river parishes, the environmental justice movement, and ecology on bikes rather than cars or a bus, we are creating a deeper experiential learning opportunity. Organizational development - we are in the deep south where resources for funding black-led groups have traditionally been scarce, especially in the fields of environment and climate change. A core part of our organizational development philosophy is creating an environmental justice movement where, rather than a scramble for resources, groups of all sizes have their funding needs met. As more money comes into the climate and environmental justice space than ever before, with national foundations keen to fund black-led groups, we are collaborating with groups to ensure that this money is spent well, while also making a plan for how these groups can retain funding when this moment has passed. In addition to co-facilitating a biweekly cohort of grassroots groups, labb also provides staff time to support groups to develop budgets, hiring processes, and build out their governance structures. The long term goal for this work is to support the establishment of six black-led stand-alone organizations in communities impacted by the petrochemical industry in Louisiana.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.4%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 76.3%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 58.4%; rating input score 58; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.39; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.4% of revenue deployed · 76.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $169K · 6 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.