Louise Demarillac Guild Sisters of Charity Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
166030208
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Buffalo, NY, USA
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$26,352
Expenses
$21,411
Assets
$13,518

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAM WARD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARY PAT LITTLEFIELD (SECRETARY)
  • PAM WARD (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization, as part of its patient services, volunteers at sisters of charity hospital gift shop and staffs a patient gift cart to serve patients and employees. The organization also holds uniform, jewelry and book sales. Contributions to sisters hospital foundation, which are raised through program service activities are annually donated to the hospital foundation. These contributions are used to purchase medical equipment.

What it reported doing in 2020

Contributions to sisters hospital foundation, which are raised through program service activities are annually donated to the hospital foundation. These contributions are used to purchase medical equipment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 98.2%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 98.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.