Loudoun Aftercare Program

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
432104678
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Elkridge, MD, USA
Phone
7039849028
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$933
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • The Rev Les Roberts (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • Jim Kempton (VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY)
  • The Rev Amy Shimonkevitz (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • The Rev Les Roberts (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • Jim Kempton (VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY)
  • The Rev Amy Shimonkevitz (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To assist previously incarcerated individuals transition into society successfully and not return to prison or jail.

What it reported doing in 2025

PROJECT MAKEOVER is a crisis management program that is specifically designed for those persons nearing release or recently released from prison or jail. Its purpose is to help them successfully integrate back into society and reduce recidivism and focuses on the short term need and skills needed to provide stability in their life and to help make the necessary changes that will last a lifetime. Project Makeover provides support through mailing/visiting inmates prior to their release to establish trust. Once they are released, the program provides basic needs support such as food, clothing, transportation, resume writing, interview couching, life coaching, and assisting them in locating housing and employment. Non-paid volunteers support this program. 2025 Accomplishments: None-Program Cancelled. Total non-paid volunteer hours: 0.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.