Lost River Ffa Alumni & Supporters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922654966
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Merrill, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5418927187
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $104,788
- Expenses
- $75,246
- Assets
- $88,628
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- COLTEN WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
- CORY THOMPSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- COLTEN WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
- BROOKE KLIEWER (SECRETARY)
- CORY THOMPSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lost river ffa alumni and supporters is a part of the national ffa organization. Lost river ffa alumni and supporters chapter is ora0104. The purpose of the organization is to support agricultural education and ffa actvities involving former members and interested persons in activities and to promote greater knoweldge of the agricultral industry and education. Ffa makes a positive difference in the lives of students by developing their potential for premier leadership, personal growth, and career success through agricultural education.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided support of agricultural education and ffa activities by involving former members and interested persons in activities. Ffa makes a positive difference in the lives of students by developing their potential for premier leadsership, personal growth, and career success through agricultural education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 67% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $121K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.