Los Lunas Gun Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
451136162
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Peralta, NM, USA
Phone
5054636898
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,640
Expenses
$53,521
Assets
$120,951

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN ROCCO BRENNA JR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN ROCCO BRENNA JR (PRESIDENT)
  • GARY ANTAL (VICE PRESIDE)
  • NANCY JO BRENNA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Los lunas gun club was founded in early 2011 by a group of valencia county citizens with some common goals in mind: the preservation of our second amendment rights as citizens of our great nation. Provide training and support in the safe and responsible use of firearms and bows for sport and recreational shooting. Promote and encourage the involvement of youth groups for the purpose of teaching sportsmanship, teamwork, and good citizenship. Provide a place where members and their guests can go to participate in: a. Target practice b. Sighting in c. Organized competitions and matches d. Camaraderie and companionship

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose for which the club is organized is the encouragement of organized shooting sports, safe gun handling, care of firearms, and improved marksmanship among the citizens of our community. The club shall promote shooting sports with all members through specialized events and activities designed to promote marksmanship. The club's further purpose is to promote the development of those characteristics of honesty, fellowship, self-discipline, teamwork, and self-reliance, which are the essentials of good sportsmanship and the foundation of true patriotism. This club is not and shall not be affiliated with any paramilitary group or militia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.26; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.