Los Gatos Thrives Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933244947
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Gatos, CA, USA
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,078
Expenses
$27,877
Assets
$25,149

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATTHEW HUDES (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • SAMUEL T PICRAUX (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TIMOTHY LUNDELL (TREASURER)
  • ANTHONY ALARCON (DIRECTOR)
  • MATTHEW HUDES (VICE-PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the los gatos thrives foundation is to sponsor and support programs and facilities that create a sense of community and belonging. Top priorities include supporting the creation of a new modern community center for the town of los gatos and assisting other organizations that promote community well-being.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organized and sponsored a monthly morning movie screening open to the public to foster a sense of community and promote awareness of the organizations mission. A nominal nondeductible charge less than fair market value was collected to help cover expenses and support the organizations goals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.4%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.2%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 103.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.4% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.