Los Gatos Athletic Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942544024
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Los Gatos, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4083952002
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $31,934
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- E Bruce Springbett (President)
People named in this filing
- E Bruce Springbett (President)
- William Frey (Secretary)
- Monica Kirkorian (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The goals of the los gatos athletic association are to provide atheltic events, recreational activities and other appropriate functions that promote the purposes of the organization; to raise funds for sponsoring, promoting, and producing activities and events related to the purposes of the organization; and to expend funds for the operation of activities consistent with the purposes of the organization.the purpose of the los gatos athletic association is to promote physical fitness and the concept of individual responsibility for one's health, as important conditions for developing healthy and successful lives; and to provide an organization that affords an opportunity for los gatos and area residents to become active participants in community activities promoting fitness and responsibility to one's health.
What it reported doing in 2025
The los gatos athletic association raised money for and donated money for its stated purpose, promoting physical fitness and athletic activities and events. This support below was to various los gatos high school athletic programs and events
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 6%; rating input score 6
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -73.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -22% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.