Los Angeles Regional Food Bank
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953135649
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3232343030
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $373,458,836
- Expenses
- $331,902,073
- Assets
- $207,867,559
- Liabilities
- $38,066,278
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
50 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL FLOOD (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL FLOOD (PRESIDENT/CEO): $370,006 total reported compensation
- ROGER L CASTLE (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $315,610 total reported compensation
- STEVEN R MEISBERGER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $308,337 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. To fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition insecurity through our partner agency network and directly through programs;* energizes the community to get involved and support hunger relief;* conducts hunger and nutrition education and awareness campaigns and advocate for public policies that benefit the people we serve.
What it reported doing in 2025
Produce and perishables program distributes a variety of fresh, nutritious, and healthy produce donated through local and regional produce distributors and growers to its agencies. The produce and perishable foods are distributed to agencies and through food bank programs. "grants" relate to food distributions to charitable organizations. Expenses: $32,421,069 grants: $31,812,702 revenue: $0usda commodity supplemental food program (csfp) allows the food bank to distribute supplemental food to low-income seniors age 60 and older who are especially vulnerable to health problems resulting from general and continued hunger due to insufficient foods. Csfp is partially funded by the usda through its agent, the California department of social services. "grants" relate to direct food distribution to individuals. Expenses: $13,779,368 grants: $10,893,701 revenue: $0the local food purchase assistance program (lfpa), provides locally sourced food products purchased from regional farmers, aggregators, and food hubs. The program is designed to support small- and mid-sized agricultural producers while enhancing access to fresh, culturally relevant foods for underserved communities. Food acquired through lfpa is distributed via the food bank's agency network and direct service programs. The usda funds the program through its agent, the California department of social services (cdss). Vendor qualification and procurement are managed by the California association of food banks (cafb) on behalf of participating food banks. "grants" relate to distributions via the food bank's agency network and direct service programs.expenses: $14,532,855 grants: $4,870,676 revenue: $0the after-school meal program, partially funded by the usda child and adult care food program (cacfp) serves children at food bank agency sites throughout los angeles county. Children in the after-school meal program typically receive tutoring assistance, participate in sports, and benefit from mentoring. Participating agencies include after-school programs, day care centers, community centers, and youth centers. Cacfp funding offsets some of the meal and other costs incurred by the children receiving meals at after-school meal program sites. Funding of other after-school meal program-related expenses is provided by grants and community support. "grants" relate to meals provided to children.expenses: $310,128 grants: $218,620 revenue: $0senior nutrition/brown bag program provides agencies serving seniors the opportunity to receive and distribute fresh fruits, vegetables, and other foods to low-income elderly persons on a weekly basis.expenses: $64,694 grants: $0 revenue: $0usda summer food service program (sfsp) provides nutritious meals to needy children in a safe and nurturing setting. The sfsp is designed to provide funding for a nutritious breakfast and lunch when children are on their summer recess. The sfsp is funded by the usda and administered by the California department of education. "grants" relate to meals provided to children.expenses: $186,962 grants: $122,177 revenue: $0calfresh outreach program is partially funded by the usda through its agent, California department of social services and California association of food banks. Calfresh outreach work includes identifying low-income families and individuals who are eligible but not receiving calfresh benefits and, when necessary, helping the family or individual with the application process, as well as educating food bank agencies and the general public about the calfresh program.expenses: $523,864 grants: $0 revenue: $0nutrition education supports the efforts of the la regional food bank to distribute high quality, nutritious and culturally appropriate food. Our goal is not only to end hunger, but to provide wellness, nourishment, and strength for our communities. The nutrition services team is committed to guiding and empowering families and individuals to make the best nutritional choices possible as an effort to i
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $59.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.6%; rating input score 97; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 28 of 29 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $319.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $370K · 50 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.2M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 828 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.