Los Angeles Habilitation House Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208579946
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Long Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5626426921
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,031,736
- Expenses
- $806,453
- Assets
- $3,061,737
- Liabilities
- $10,395
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Nancy Albin (Vice President)
- Guido Piccarolo (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Guido Piccarolo (CEO): $88,231 total reported compensation
- Nancy Albin (Vice President): $83,825 total reported compensation
- Mike Mann (Supervisor): $47,879 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of LAHH is to create and maintain job opportunities for people with disabilities in order that they might develop, express, and apply their talents through their work and in their communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Janitorial Employment Program and Outreach Training Services combined with Youth Training, Certificate, and Work Experience Program. JEPOTS is a program for people with disabilities and YTCWE is a youth program for people with disabilities who are between the ages of 16 - 21 years old. Several foundations fund this program as their mission is to support youth who have disadvantages. The AbilityOne Program, administered by SourceAmerica, connects federal contracting officers with opportunities to procure services and products from non-profits whose mission aligns. LAHH is a producing agency with SourceAmerica and has the responsibility to outreach, train, employ, accommodate, and support job placement into other areas of interest for employment that are expressed by people with disabilities. Specifically LAHH is providing paid work experience, paid training, and accommodations, and job placement services for people who have disabilities in the building services sector. This sector crosses all major industries and is needed in almost every town across America, regardless of population. LAHH provided support, accommodations, and training to 1 individual who have disabilities to transition into a new career after working with LAHH. LAHH maintained all employees with disabilities and without disabilities employment, 24 people, and provided supports, accommodations, including additional unpaid leave as needed. LAHH provided training on-site across all locations with a total of 1,285 hours of training onsite and online provided, amounting to $34,173 paid training wages. Onsite training as well as classroom style training is a key success factor and provided repetitious training and reminding which is an essential accommodation for people with disabilities in order for them to be successful and safe at work. Provided additional supports and accommodations to 1 new hires. Maintained two working supervisors, two working leads, and provided in supports and accommodations for people with disabilities in the workplace.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.8%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.8%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.8; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.8% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $708K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.