Los Angeles Dysautonomia Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921871226
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Pasadena, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2134880300
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $160,135
- Expenses
- $118,343
- Assets
- $112,047
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sally Krueger-Wyman (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- Sally Krueger-Wyman (President & CEO)
- Emily Sunez (Outreach Direct)
- Danielle Hinde (COB)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Los Angeles Dysautonomia Network (LADN) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to providing mental health, community, education, and financial support for individuals impacted by dysautonomia in the LA and greater CA area
What it reported doing in 2025
Education Program: Empowers patients and caregivers through webinars and workshops with experts in fields relevant to the dysautonomia experience. 171 people participated in 2025 classes, and 41,000 people watched LADN's educational videos.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 80% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 92%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.1%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 48.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 89.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 50% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 92% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $109K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.