Los Alegres Ancianos Mexicanos Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262051048
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Greeley, CO, USA
Phone
9703537030
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,914
Expenses
$9,621
Assets
$12,506
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Geneva Llamas (President)
  • Carmen Martinez (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Mary Martinez (Treasurer)
  • Pat Bennividz (Director)
  • Alex Peratta (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the general welfare of Weld County's elderly population paying special attention to the needs of Weld County's Spanish surnamed elderly population to enrich and encourage Weld County's elderly population, especially Weld County's Spanish surnamed elderly population, to improve their condition through the exercise of democratic, constitutional and legal rights of self-expression, self-organization, and participation in decisions, policies and programs affecting their lives and to achieve the full participation by such persons in the benefits and responsibilities of first class citizenship in our society.The further purpose of the Corporation is to plan, organize, supplement, coordinate and execute a program or programs designed to improve the quality of life of Weld County's elderly population, especially Weld County's Spanish surnamed elderly population; to aid such individuals in achieving their full potential and a sense of dignity and self-respect; to enrich the lives of

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization provided support to 18 seniors in need of assistance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.9%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.3%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.9% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.