Los Alamos Swim Team Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850202971
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Los Alamos, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5056620525
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,159
- Expenses
- $96,343
- Assets
- $56,595
- Liabilities
- $810
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANASTASIA MCLAUGHLIN (President)
People named in this filing
- ANASTASIA MCLAUGHLIN (President)
- SARAH WHITE (Director)
- JASON ANDERSON (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide a thrilling environment for building competitive swimmers with skills they can incorporate through all facets of their lives. LA Swim Team Incorporated stresses a healthly competitive spirit, strong team bonds, a safe and nurturing environment, and wishes to foster a life-long love for swimming.
What it reported doing in 2024
Meet registrations: provide payment to hosting teams for all swim team participants in any particular meet. NM swimming registrations: provide payments to state and national level organizations which provide insurance to swimmers and team.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.