CommonSpirit Health Mountain Region

Legal name: Longmont United Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840460697
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Centennial, CO, US
Phone
303-290-6500
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,556,318
Expenses
$138,316,929
Assets
$295,689,561
Liabilities
$251,690,464

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW GAASCH (FOMER OFFICER/PRESIDENT MOUNTAIN REGION)
  • RYAN TOBIN (BOARD MEMBER/MARKET PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTI OLSON (FORMER INTERIM CEO)
  • CHAD HATFIELD (FORMER PRESIDENT)
  • DEB MOHESKY (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREW GAASCH (FOMER OFFICER/PRESIDENT MOUNTAIN REGION): $2,430,605 total reported compensation
  • HILARIE GUTIERREZ (PHYSICIAN): $1,339,185 total reported compensation
  • HORACIO GUTIERREZ (PHYSICIAN): $862,446 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To make the healing presence of God known, improve health, and advance social justice for all.

What it reported doing in 2024

Longmont united hospital is a full-service acute care hospital located in longmont, Colorado. We have provided high-quality, whole person care for more than 60 years to longmont and the surrounding communities. Longmont united hospital was one of the first to be designated as a planetree hospital in Colorado. This means we provide a person-centered approach in every aspect of care. Our caregivers treat the entire person because we understand the powerful connection between the body, mind, and spirit. We combine advanced technology, innovative treatments, and compassionate healing for patients at every stage of life.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 52.1%; rating input score 52; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 78.6%; rating input score 79; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -27.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.14; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $116.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.4M · 26 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.4M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 336 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.