Long Valley Soccer Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222727219
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Long Valley, NJ, USA
Phone
9088769481
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$21,062
Assets
$65,224
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dan Twomey (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dan Twomey (President)
  • Ryan Davies (Acting Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Service community members by teaching youth soccer skills, fair sportsmanship, etc. This club is no longer an operating entity however as we have merged with a neighboring organization. This club did not generate any program revenues this year as everything runs through the newer combined organization. We only have some expenses we are paying here but will most likely reimburse throught he other entiy (West Morris Soccer Club) and then we will merge finances and end this entity.

What it reported doing in 2020

This entity is no longer an operating entity. Its members are now members of a neighboring org who continues to service the local community to develop soccer and life skills and provide support and growth in all areas for the youth. This entity will most likely be terminated in the next year as the new entity "West Morris Soccer Club" now services the Long Valley community for soccer training, etc.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 35

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.1; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.