Long Valley Hopes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920471663
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Califon, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9149806536
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,675
- Expenses
- $39,786
- Assets
- $44,809
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DENISE MCCRONE-SABO (PRESIDENT)
- TARYN MANSOLINO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DENISE MCCRONE-SABO (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER MOORE (SECRETARY)
- TARYN MANSOLINO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide support to New Jersey residents, and/or their families, who have been diagnosed with cancer or other serious illnesses, or have been financially impacted by such a diagnosis; to provide financial support for scholarship funds benefitting minors impacted by cancer or other serious illness; and to educate and inform the public of the impact of cancer on individuals and families and provide them with the knowledge and vehicle to support those persons.
What it reported doing in 2025
To provide support to New Jersey residents, and/or their families, who have been diagnosed with cancer or other serious illnesses, or have been financially impacted by such a diagnosis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.7%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.2%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 65.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.7% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.