Long Term Care Alternatives Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464216581
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Mastic Beach, NY, USA
Phone
6313954232
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Reported finances

Revenue
$350
Expenses
$350
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY SORKOW (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NANCY SORKOW (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Long term care alternatives, inc., was created by maura spery, nancy sorkow, karen gilleete, and noreen berger in 2013 as they graduated as licensed masters of social workers. Ltca offers alternative solutions for the challenges of aging through education, counseling, research and referrals. We want to help construct the third stage of life for our elders, friends and families as a fruitful, dignified and serene phase which will allow preparation and acceptance of aging and end of life with courage and love. Our mission is to serve as a resource and foster the values, principles, and practices of culture change: dignity, respect, self determination and purposeful living, for all who work and live in the continuum of long term care. Our long term goal is to create alternative housing that reflects these principles and ideals.

What it reported doing in 2020

This entity is in the starting up phase.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -30.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.