Long Life Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455283900
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Springfield, MO, USA
- Phone
- 4178862063
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,792
- Expenses
- $41,060
- Assets
- $5,359
- Liabilities
- $11,692
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Patrick Long (President)
- Jeremy Long (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mark Grantham (Director)
- Michelle Maserang (Director)
- Patrick Long (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Long Life Ministries is a not-for-profit organization focusing on the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ, through charitable services, to enhance the spiritual knowledge of healing through faith. We are focused in our purpose to medically treat with acupuncture treatments, herbal consultations, edification, and to donate into other outreach missions through GOD. All those in need of health care can come to receive acupuncture treatment, herbal consultation, and edification from the word of GOD. We do not charge for our treatments or consultations, but arethankful and appreciative of all donations that come in to help support us in our mission to serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide medical treatment through spriitual/natural knowledge of healing
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.18; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.