Long Lake Animal Rescue

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832132650
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Maple Plain, MN, USA
Phone
9524842545
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,996
Expenses
$40,911
Assets
$11,671
Liabilities
$89,968

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISTEN ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MOISES PEREZ (DIRECTOR)
  • KRISTEN ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK ANDERSON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization assists in the rescue of abandoned and abused animals which includes providing temporary boarding and re-training until they can be permanently placed.

What it reported doing in 2024

Long lake animal rescue is an animal rescue located in long lake, Minnesota that rescues and cares for abandoned and abused animals including cats, dogs, and donkeys. Long lake animal rescue is run by volunteers who care for the animals in long lake, Minnesota. In 2024, long lake animal rescue rescued 25-40 animals including goats, donkeys, cats, dogs, and horses. Long lake animal rescue is a charitable organization dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals and to creating a better life for abused and abandoned animals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.3%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.71; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -73.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -77.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 152.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.3% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.