Long Island Regional Advisory Council on Higher Education
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510243480
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Brookville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5162993149
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $1,575
- Assets
- $43,407
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- DR HENRY C FOLEY (TRUSTEE)
- DR EDWARD BONAHUE (TRUSTEE)
- DR KIMBERLY R CLINE (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purposes of lirache are as follows: 1) to promote member cooperation on issues including economic development, community relations, media contacts, legislative initiatives, data collection, and campus operations; 2) to speak with one voice to business leaders, legislators and school superintendents; 3) to work with the k-12 sector to promote a seamless transition from high school to college for all students; 4) to create community awarenes of the extraordinary breadth, depth, and excellence of instruction, research, and community service taking place at member institutions.
What it reported doing in 2024
To promote member cooperation on issues including economic development, community relations, media contacts, legislative initiatives, data collection and campus obligations. To speak with one voice to business leaders, legislators and school superintendents. To work with the k-12 sector to promote a seamless transition from high school to college for all students. To create community awareness of the extraordinary breadth, depth and excellence of instruction, research and community service taking place at member institutions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: NotEnoughData
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 27.56; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.