Long Island Home Builders Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113634550
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Melville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6312322345
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,923
- Expenses
- $63,380
- Assets
- $329,756
- Liabilities
- $43,723
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL SOUTO (CHAIRMAN)
- CHARLES MANCINI (CHAIRMAN EMERITUS)
- ANDREW NIGRI (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The long island homebuilding industry cares about our communities and has unique construction expertise, skilled manpower and material resources to assist our residents. Long island home builders care, inc. Was created to apply the builder's construction capability to directly assist families or individuals, who are otherwise unable to overcome special life challenges or to enhance community facilities which otherwise could not adequately serve such persons and to provide financial assistance to children or grandchildren of members and their employees who are planning to attend college.
What it reported doing in 2024
Long island home builders care, inc. Applies the builder's construction capability to directly assist families or individuals, who are otherwise unable to overcome special life challenges or to enhance community facilities which otherwise could not adequately serve such persons.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.4%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.2; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.4% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.