Logic Creative Labs Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863555708
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Woodstock, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6785778247
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $198,689
- Expenses
- $196,141
- Assets
- $56,049
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shana Silva (President)
- Tara Meyer (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Shana Silva (President)
- Kelly Jordan (Member)
- Leah Wiegand (Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a world class learning center for parents and students engaged in homeschooling for primary and secondary education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Logic Creative Labs served 132 students and 69 families for the duration of the school year. We offered over 30 weeks of instructional content for K 12 students and their families, with over 200 unique class offerings. We provided multiple enrichment activities, including tween and teen nights, yearbook, prom, holiday bazaar and talent shows. The objective of these activities is to offer unique, tangible and quality educational experiences to families that are homeschooling in the area. The organization provides families and students with a chance to learn alongside other homeschooled families. It also provides outside expertise for families where parents are unable to provide direct instruction
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.7%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $196K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.