Logans Roadhouse Hurricane Relief Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203463289
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Phone
6158859056
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,673
Expenses
$15,356
Assets
$194,711
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSH KERN (PRESIDENT)
  • HAZEM OUF (FORMER DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES STEVENSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BILL STREITBERGER (FORMER VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSH KERN (PRESIDENT)
  • COURTNEY MOWRY (SECRETARY)
  • HAZEM OUF (FORMER DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Logan's roadhouse hurricane relief, inc. Assists employees of logan's roadhouse, inc., its subsidiaries, affiliates and related companies, all doing business as logan's roadhouse, inc. ("logan's"), facing financial challenges created by an unexpected emergency. In 2005, hundreds of logan's employees were affected by hurricanes along the gulf coast in Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama. Logan's recognized the need and opportunity to assist our employees who face these challenges but do not have the financial resources to meet their immediate needs. This program provides basic necessities including food and temporary housing. The program also provides temporary financial assistance to employees of logan's roadhouse, inc. For unexpected emergencies including natural disasters, loss of housing and/or funeral expenses for an immediate family member.

What it reported doing in 2019

To help ease the suffering of employees personally affected by disasters and tragedies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.6%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 71.4%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.68; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -66.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.