Local Management Board of Allegany County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043807159
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Cumberland, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3017847060
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $551,722
- Expenses
- $551,687
- Assets
- $412,286
- Liabilities
- $359,582
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
People named in this filing
- MELANIE CHAPMAN (SECRETARY)
- BECKI CLARK (DIRECTOR)
- KAREN CROSBY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Building the community's capacity to provide parents and caregivers the resources to create nurturing, stable environments for our county's children through interagency coordination and planning.
What it reported doing in 2020
Model smoking program - designed to promote awareness and knowledge of harms of tobacco use among school aged children in grades 5-8. A specific emphasis will be placed on the prevention of vaping.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 89% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.7%; rating input score 99; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.87; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $443K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.