Livonia City Soccer Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262834041
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Livonia, MI, USA
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $831,131
- Expenses
- $864,538
- Assets
- $12,089
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES C BURNETTE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MIKE BONA (VICE PRESIDE): $26,843 total reported compensation
- MATT GRODZICKI (SECRETARY): $8,260 total reported compensation
- JAMES C BURNETTE (PRESIDENT): $8,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The livonia city soccer club strives to be an affordable soccer program that facilitates player, team and personal development in a positive atmosphere at all levels of play. The lcsc is committed to sportsmanship, teamwork, family involvement and fun. Livonia city soccer club is a non profit organization providing a friendly environment for growth within our community. We offer select, premier, and recreational levels. Our philosophy rests in granting all players equal opportunities and benefits within their level of play in the sport of soccer. The club provides recreational players with a developmental opportunity by emphasizing participation in a family centered environment. The club also provides select and premier players with opportunities to develop into elite athletes. With multiples teams at almost every age group, the livonia city soccer club truly is the club in southeast Michigan for players of all ages and abilities.
What it reported doing in 2016
The purpose of the lcsc shall be to promote and develop soccer among youth and to encourage a spirit of good conduct and sportsmanship in all areas of the sport. Lcsc shall regulate, promote and organize recreational and competitive teams for the benefit of all its members, participating in local, state and national competitions. The organization is exclusively for charitable and educational purposes and fosters national and international amateur athletic competition within the meaning of 501c3 of the internal revenue code of 1986 (as amended).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -93.3% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 90 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $863K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $27K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.