Livingston Robotics Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273514562
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Roseland, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9739926411
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,273
- Expenses
- $7,717
- Assets
- $12,338
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NICOLE SMITH (PRESIDENT)
- SONALI IPTE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALAN KARPAS (BOARD MEMBER)
- HOLLY LAM (BOARD MEMBER)
- PEARL HWANG (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Livingston Robotics Club (LRC), an IRS 501(c)(3) organization, is a robotics community for grades K-12. Based in Livingston, New Jersey, USA, the club is open to families from area towns and communities. Founded in 2007 and officially incorporated in 2010, it was created and is operated on a purely voluntary basis by parents and mentors passionate about our mission.Through the generous support and annual donation of Eastman Companies, LRC offers member teams access to a 6000sf facility to hold team meetings and practice sessions. Our TeamAt LRC, we pride ourselves on having a diverse team of robotics enthusiasts who are passionate about innovation and technology. Each member brings a unique perspective to the table, fostering an environment of creativity and collaboration. Join us in getting to know the talented individuals who make LRC a hub for robotic excellence.
What it reported doing in 2024
Join a Team or Build a TeamThere are many competitive robotics programs where students can get hands-on learning opportunities through guided challenges. To learn more about the programs and how to start a team, check our event calendar and join our Open House Events on Facebook.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.9%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.