Living Waters Publications

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270094016
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Bellflower, CA, USA
Phone
5622079300
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religious Media, Communications
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,183,897
Expenses
$6,262,288
Assets
$7,758,234
Liabilities
$362,221

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RAYMOND COMFORT (CEO)
  • EMEAL ZWAYNE (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK SPENCE (SR. VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • EMEAL ZWAYNE (PRESIDENT): $228,008 total reported compensation
  • MARK SPENCE (SR. VICE PRESIDENT): $220,398 total reported compensation
  • DANIEL COMFORT (EXEC. VP/SECRETARY): $207,888 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To publish, produce, distribute, and sell/donate religious books, tracts, pamphlets, video and audio tapes as well as provide radio, web and t.v. Programming to teach christians how to share their faith effectively.

What it reported doing in 2024

Street evangelism (program expenditures - $571,484.40)this weekly program focuses on preaching the biblical principle of man's need for repentance and salvation at outdoor venues such as parks, beaches, higher educational facilities, and anywhere the general public might be found in large numbers. In addition to speaking, the printed resources of the organization are passed out and discussed one-on-one between ministry volunteers and members of the general public. The program also supplies resources, free of charge, to employees as an ongoing encouragement to be engaged in the practice of street and personal evangelism in their everyday surroundings. This program also involves the staff development of new or revised printed resources. For the year ended december 31, 2024, the organization generated and distributed five new gospel tracts. The program is highly effective in that biblical teaching is going out to the public on a regular basis, and in that it provides a consistent real-world opportunity for the training of christians to effectively share their faith. The organization have continued to support local and state volunteers who attended local conferences, book fairs, and other civic functions and gave away copies of select evangelistic materials supplied by living waters at no charge. This support provides a better means for meeting the need for localized evangelism training by those in the specific geographic area. Additionally, we donated materials to several event workers, organizations, and individuals for free use and distribution. In 2024, one such large scale event provided customized resources to be given away leading up to and during the olympic summer games in paris france. During this outreach, millions of free resources were provided to christians in the u.s., the u.k., europe, australia and new zealand.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 75
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.6%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 51.5%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 89.4%; rating input score 89; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.6% of revenue deployed · 51.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 12 filed program accomplishments · $3.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $228K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $325K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.