Living in Recovery Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300651794
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Columbia, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4437411331
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $610,473
- Expenses
- $313,964
- Assets
- $1,109,154
- Liabilities
- $515,718
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROGER HOFF (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN AMATO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROGER HOFF (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN AMATO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CINDY WYATT TREASURER (UNTIL JULY, THEN BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To help men and women reclaim their lives from addiction by combining safe, structured, supportive housing that fosters an environment of personal and peer accountability.
What it reported doing in 2024
Living in recovery, inc. (lir) currently operates two houses for men and one for women with a total of 19 beds. The population served is adults in recovery from alcohol and/or drug addiction. Too often people leaving drug and alcohol treatment programs and quickly relapse because they return to their former housing and associates that were supportive of their addiction. Recovery housing helps stop the cycle of addiction-rehab-relapse and increases the chance for sustained recovery. Lir owns or leases residential properties in howard county to provide this housing, but the focus of the work is on helping residents take responsibility for their sobriety and develop the skills, habits and relationships that will allow them to sustain it. Lir does not provide substance abuse treatment but requires that residents must remain free of drugs and alcohol, and be actively involved in a daily recovery program, including regular attendance in aa or na meetings, all residents are encouraged to obtain a sponsor and a home group in their first 30 days. They are subject to random drug and alcohol testing. Residents are encouraged to develop a personal recovery plan that may include professional outpatient treatment. Lir staff and volunteers monitor sobriety, safety, housekeeping, and routine house activities. They are expected to obtain and maintain employment, share household chores, participate in weekly house meetings, abide by curfews and pay rent weekly in advance. They provide their own food and prepare their own meals. There is no time limit on residency; they may stay as long as they like, although most move to more independent living within one year. Since its inception, living in recovery has served over 300 residents and 65% have remained clean and sober while in residence. The positive impacts are many: sobriety, employment, reconnection with family, the mutual support of residents all facing the same struggle, and a higher quality of life. The impact is not limited to the resident, but extends to family, friends, employers, co-workers and the community in general, which will no longer need to hospitalize, arrest or incarcerate them.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 67% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.6%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 73.1%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $24.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.6% of revenue deployed · 73.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $230K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.