Living at Home Block Nurse Program Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363512437
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Saint Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6516490315
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
In-Home Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$189,412
Expenses
$168,858
Assets
$305,732
Liabilities
$117,402

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Sharon Bring (Director)
  • Deade Johnson (Director)
  • Teisha Magee (Board Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Living at Home Network is a resource hub and advocate, an advisor on operations, and a connector among all members. Each year Minnesotans continue to live independently at home with the help of 32 non-profit, community-held programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Strengthening Communities, Supporting Independence: LAHN's 2024 Impact In 2024, the Living at Home Network (LAHN) continued to lead the way in transforming healthy aging across Minnesota. We supported a vibrant network of 32 nonprofit organizations, empowering them to serve more than 8,000 older adults across the state. At the heart of our model is the power of community-local volunteers who provide essential services like transportation, friendly visits, homemaking support, and meal delivery, helping older adults remain safely and comfortably in their homes.Our work this year focused on four key pillars: 1. Technical Assistance & Grant Support - We helped our member organizations access and manage public funding efficiently, ensuring critical services could continue and grow. 2. Advocacy & Representation - By amplifying the voices of older adults and our member organizations at local, regional, and state levels, we advanced policies in partnership with groups like the Minnesota Leadership Council on Aging. 3. Operational & Administrative Efficiencies - We streamlined backend operations, reduced costs, and leveraged collective buying power-allowing our members to focus more of their energy where it matters most: direct service. 4. Member Networking & Best Practices - Through knowledge-sharing and collaboration, we strengthened aging-in-place strategies across the state. Our September Member Conference brought together 100 professionals for breakout sessions, peer learning, and meaningful connection. Through every initiative, LAHN stays true to its mission: to transform the landscape of healthy aging across Minnesota by empowering our community-based partners with resources, advocacy, and collaboration.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 62% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $30.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.9%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.81; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 64% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $117K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.