Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc

What it reported doing in 2024

Find-A-Way and Margaret B. Geier Apartment Communities: Located in Oakley and Kennedy Heights, respectively, each building has 39 individual units (78 total), many of which are fully accessible. The units are subsidized and designed for independent living with onsite management and supports. Through support coordination or direct support, LADD served all 78 individuals in FY 2024. Located in Oakley and Kennedy Heights, respectively, each building has 39 individual units (78 total), many of which are fully accessible. The units are subsidized and designed for independent living with onsite management and supports. Through support coordination or direct support, LADD served all 78 individuals in FY 2024.LADD provides community supports for adults with developmental disabilities in their own home. These supports offer those served opportunities to learn and strengthen independent living skills, including how to access different services in the community. LADD served a total of 26 individuals in FY 2024.Smart Homes: LADD owned or licensed homes are staffed with in-person support and remote support powered by Smart Living Systems. Homes are state-of-the-art technology enabled homes, in walkable neighborhoods, close to bus stops and sidewalks that lead to places where people can shop and work. These homes are in clusters of three or more within a five-minute drive for in-person staff. The level and type of staffingremote and/or in-person--for each house is determined by Individual Service Plans (ISP) developed for each person that addresses support needs and ensure their health and safety while living in the community. LADD served a total of 20 individuals in FY 2024.HLADD (Shared Living & Respite Services): Provides residential settings that support adults with developmental disabilities to reach his/her goals by living with a family/person in a typical home environment. All providers are certified to offer services through the Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities. Respite services are provided for planned or emergency temporary care and support; these services occur in a shared-living provider's home to provide a short-term break to primary caregivers. LADD served a total of 63 individuals in FY 2024SOAR (Services for the Ownership and Acquisition of Residences): Helps adults with developmental disabilities find a place to live and navigate the Housing Choice Voucher program (a federal housing program that assists low-income individuals and families afford housing in the private market). As the preferred community partner for adults with developmental disabilities with Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority, SOAR provides: (1) streamlined housing choice voucher process for new applicants, (2) support to maintain participation in housing choice voucher, (3)facilitation of the annual recertification process, (4) client-landlord mediation and (5) support to ensure housing voucher program compliance. LADD served a total of 432 individuals in FY 2024Senior Living at Victory Parkway: Adults with developmental disabilities are living longer, healthier, more meaningful lives; yet, traditional nursing facilities lack staff trained in the needs of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Senior Living at Victory Parkway offers support for dementia and memory care, health and wellness services, nursing services as well as modified services and living environments to meet aging needs for people 55 and older. The campus is under renovation and will have the capacity to serve 22 individuals once completed. LADD served a total of 10 individuals in FY 2024. Remote Supports: Powered by LADD's proprietary and award-winning Smart Living Systems. We utilize customized smart home technology as well as wearable devices to create customized, predictive supports that help people with developmental disabilities live more independent lives. Remote supports are designed to be predictive, rather than reactive, and is staffed local

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 73.3%; rating input score 73
• Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81
• Fundraising efficiency: $5.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
  • Compensation committee: Missing
  • Independent consultant: Missing
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
  • Written employment contract: Missing
  • Compensation survey or study: Pass
  • Board or committee approval: Pass
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.91; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings