Livewell Greenville
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811376760
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Greenville, SC, USA
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,393,966
- Expenses
- $2,029,618
- Assets
- $776,300
- Liabilities
- $197,451
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH WILLS (EXECUTIVE DI): $96,997 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Livewell greenville's mission is to increase access to healthy foods and active living opportunities by convening community members and partners to impact policies, systems, and environmental changes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Livewell greenville (lwg) is a coalition of over 150 partners with a vision to make greenville county the healthiest place to live in the nation by removing barriers to healthy eating and active living. The coalition intentionally works to break down bureaucratic barriers, reduce duplication, and mutually reinforce current investments in the community. As a result, lwg has grown into a robust partnership comprised of leaders across every sector of greenville county. Lwg's efforts have been held up nationally as a model for creating community change via a coalition model. Lwg works toward creating societal shifts that result in transformational change through partnerships with governments, businesses, non-profits, and philanthropic organizations while building trust in the communities where change is needed most. The coalition not only adheres to community based participatory research techniques and evidence-based interventions, but also truly addresses health equity for all in greenville county. 1. Lwg uses the social innovation theory's collective impact model to address the complex problem of obesity. Utilizing the five core components of collective impact- common agenda, shared measurement, mutually reinforcing activities, continuous communication, and backbone support staff - coalition partners create community-level change that affects more than 50,000 at a time. As the backbone of this movement, lwg serves as the neutral convener for organizations with a vested interest in improving the health of the community. 2. Lwg believes that with long lasting policy, system and environmental (pse) change, as opposed to short-term programs, the landscape of our community can change to create a permeating culture of health for all, regardless of income, race, or address. 3. Lwg leads with data and evaluation in decision-making. The coalition draws from its three foundational studies (youth body mass index study, food environment study, parks and environmental justice study) to identify where specific interventions ought to be focused for maximum impact, but also to provide a way to track the effects of pse changes on obesity and chronic disease.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.1%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $169.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.1% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.