Liv Forum

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392270371
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Vienna, VA, USA
Phone
5715850480
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$183,466
Expenses
$12,579
Assets
$176,208
Liabilities
$5,321

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIRANJOT (PRESIDENT/DI)

People named in this filing

  • ARJUN SETHI (TREASURER/DI)
  • RYAN KOHLI (SECRETARY/DI)
  • KIRANJOT (PRESIDENT/DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Liv forum for panjab and sikh affairs offers policymakers and organizations independent research and analysis to aid informed decision-making on panjab-related matters in india and sikh-related matters globally.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization provides education, research and analysis to aid informed dicision-making on panjab-related matters in india and sikh-related matters globally. This is accomplished by a weekly digest (52 publishes of top 10 news and analysis) and reports and fact shees (4 publishes of data-driven understanding & recommendations).

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 24
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.9%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: 56.4%; rating input score 56

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 93.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.01; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.9% of revenue deployed · 56.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.