Little Sisters of the Poor of the City and County of Philadelphia

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
231552179
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2157295153
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,784,580
Expenses
$6,772,979
Assets
$57,794,734
Liabilities
$30,777,576

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SISTER CELINE VADUKKOOT LSP (PRESIDENT)
  • SISTER MARIA FLICKER LSP (VICE-PRESIDENT, SECRETARY)

Highest reported compensation

  • LISA DORRIN (DIRECTOR OF NURSING): $126,389 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The little sisters of the poor of philadelphia operate holy family home, a mission-driven long-term care community providing nursing, residential, spiritual, and compassionate care services for economically vulnerable elderly individuals of all faith traditions in a family-centered environment.

What it reported doing in 2025

Founded in philadelphia in 1869, the little sisters of the poor operate holy family home, a catholic long-term care community, providing nursing, residential, spiritual, and compassionate care services for low-income elderly individuals of all backgrounds and faith traditions. The home serves economically vulnerable older adults through an aging-in-place approach that enables each resident to remain in a familiar setting while receiving increasing levels of support as needed. The little sisters provide person-centered care focused on dignity, meaningful quality of life, social engagement, a family-centered community setting, pastoral support, and compassionate accompaniment through the later stages of life. Recent form 990 financial fluctuations reflect the completion and occupancy transitions of holy family home's once-in-a-generation rebuilding and modernizatoin project, finalized in 2025, including significant capital expenditures construction-related activity, and associated long-term financing obligations. These figures primarily reflect the financial impact of a transformational public-private investment designed to modernize eldercare services and strengthen the organization's long-term mission sustainability, rather than instability in ongoing operations. Located in the kingsessing neighborhood of southwest philadelphia, holy family home serves as an important community anchor and source of neighborhood stability in an economically challenged area affected by poverty, food insecurity, and homelessness. The organization's newly rebuilt and modernized facility was supported through a combination of philanthropic and public investment, recognizing both the critical need for eldercare services and the home's significant role in community revitalization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.7%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $27.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.2%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.53; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.7% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 4 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $8.5M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.