Little Sisters of The Poor

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
440571339
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Kansas City, MO, USA
Phone
8167614744
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,092,608
Expenses
$8,185,552
Assets
$8,688,060
Liabilities
$500,742

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SR GONZAGUE CASTRO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SR MARGARET LENNON (PRESIDENT (OUTGOING))
  • SR MARY THOMAS D'MELLO (PRESIDENT (INCOMING))

Highest reported compensation

  • DORTHINE KULP (DIRECTOR OF NURSING): $116,537 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Little sisters of the poor operates the jeanne jugan center, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy, elderly and poor. The home is part of the international congregation of little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in 1839, and serves the elderly in 30 countries.

What it reported doing in 2024

Skilled and intermediate nursing care for 18,083 patient days for welfare agency and private residents. A. Physical care - little sisters of the poor provide licensed nursing care, medical, dental and podiatry care, physical therapy and pharmaceutical services. The challenges of aging are myriad and managing the physical needs of the elderly is a monumental task. As little sisters, we are committed to promoting the dignity of human life of each and every one of our residents. Medical doctors visit the home several times a week. Dental and podiatry care, as well as physical therapy, are provided within the home. In a spirit of humble service and hospitality, the little sisters provide nursing care to the residents with utmost respect for the dignity of the individual person. The sisters, through a prayerful, bedside presence, provide spiritual care to dying residents. B. Spiritual care - little sisters accept elderly people into their home without regard to religion or race. Having a faith that sustains and comforts in hard times is a particular blessing as we move toward the end of life. When elderly people are offered the benefits of a spiritual program, their lives become more complete and secure. The little sisters foster their residents' faith by offering daily mass by a resident chaplain and other spiritually-related programs. Many of the residents attend mass on a regular basis and find comfort and hope in the traditions of the catholic church. Other residents go into the chapel to pray and meditate while others attend the church of their choice. Each resident is encouraged to practice his/her faith. When it is clear that one of the residents is dying, the sisters take turns (along with family members) being with the resident, making him or her as comfortable as possible, praying, and reading comforting scriptures. They remain by the resident's side until death comes because they believe that no one should die alone. C. Activities - the philosophy of little sisters of the poor is that spiritual well-being, social interaction, and loving care, are the keys to living a long and fruitful life. Meaningful activity is the cornerstone of a holistic model of care. Having a center of interest, doing something they like to do, feeling useful, being able to take initiatives, to communicate and form friendships, maintaining a relationship with family, having contacts with youth. These are the factors which provide joy and happiness. Little sisters offer many activities - exercise programs, arts/crafts, baking, bowling, card games, music appreciation, games, group discussions, and outings to restaurants, shops, and cultural events. Also available are a beauty parlor, coffee shop, gift shop, library, and craft room. Many residents participate at the home by folding clothes in the laundry, helping in the dining room or selling items to other residents in the sweet pea convenience shop, which is specially designed for residents' needs. Residents who take part in the various activities form more meaningful relationships and have a better perspective on the aging process.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.4%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.4% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 6 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.