Little League Baseball Inc Kerrville Little League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742032568
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Kerrville, TX, USA
Phone
8308952265
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$175,224
Expenses
$110,010
Assets
$140,452
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TYLER MONTGOMERY (VICE PRESIDENT - SOFTBALL)
  • SARAH ZIMMERMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • GREG BUTLER (VICE PRESIDENT - BASEBALL)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER LIGON (SECRETARY)
  • TYLER MONTGOMERY (VICE PRESIDENT - SOFTBALL)
  • LINDSAY WILSON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of kerrville little league is to implant in the children of the community the good ideals of sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage and respect for authority. Through the baseball and softball programs, we hope to develop in our children a love for the game, the value of teamwork, and the responsibilities of being on a team in a safe and positive learning enivronment.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide facilities and equipment for area youth to participate in organized baseball and softball competition.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 60.6%; rating input score 61

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 38% of revenue deployed · 60.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $67K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.