Little Chute Gridiron Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 392000002
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Little Chute, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9207887053
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Football
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $77,536
- Expenses
- $69,985
- Assets
- $41,240
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON WEGAND (President)
- CHRIS KANG (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JASON WEGAND (President)
- CHRIS KANG (Vice President)
- CHARLIE HIETPAS (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The goal of the little chute gridiron association is to promote little chute student athletes from grades 6-12 by supporting the coaches and the district to provide a safe and productive environment that enables youth to learn and apply the principles of teamwork, discipline, dedication and sportsmanship. This is done through the raising of funds for equipment, uniforms, meals, scholarships, and anything the football team deems necessary to keep the players safe and teach them the game of football.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided teams in the organization with necessary equipment and uniforms to promote team unity and accomplish the goals of teaching football skills, technique, communication, improving safety and preventing injury in the game of football.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.2%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.2% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.