Literature for All of Us

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364167228
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
8478697323
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Remedial Reading, Reading Encouragement

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$147,769
Expenses
$121,072
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NEWLIN O WOLLASTON (PRESIDENT)
  • JULIE VICTOR (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NEWLIN O WOLLASTON (PRESIDENT)
  • JULIE VICTOR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LIZ MCCABE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Literature for all of us (lfaou) uses books and writing to facilitate circles of connection, healing, and growth in the face of social inequity. By inviting participants to explore the transformative power of their own voices, we help build resilience.

What it reported doing in 2021

Since 1997, literature for all of us has grown from a single book group of low-income teenage moms to serving over 700 participants from a diversity of backgrounds-over 9,000 participants to date. We now serve 30 book groups in 15 schools and community organizations including alternative schools and work training programs, as well as programs for incarcerated youth, pregnant and parenting teens, domestic violence survivors, and members of the lgbtq+ community. This year, participants wrote more than 1,700 poems and received nearly 2,500 books-including more than 400 children's books-building in-home libraries across chicago.literature for all of us engages its participants in weekly book groups that engage in culturally-relevant texts with thoughtful dialogue and poetic response. We use trauma-informed curricular and methods that create a safe and intimate space for book group participants to share their stories and perspectives. In recent years, participants have reported the book group increased their self-esteem, their desire to stay in school, and their connections to peers. We open worlds by opening books. We improve reading comprehension and critical thinking: our active approach to reading and discussion engages young people, english language learners, and those struggling with low literacy. Within the safety of the book group circle, participants read and discuss literature with confidence. They analyze characters and themes, share their ideas and opinions, and relate the texts to their own lives.we build resilience: our trauma-informed model draws from best practices in traditional talk therapy to foster connection, self-exploration, and healing. Using literature, participants reflect on traumatic experience in a way that engages both the thinking and feeling parts of their brains, allowing new perspectives and insights. They re-frame their own experience in ways that disrupt harmful narratives, and develop a greater sense of power and agency in sharing and exploring their personal stories.we improve family literacy: through our empowering parents, inspiring children (e.p.i.c.) program, we educate pregnant and parenting teens about the benefits of reading to their children to encourage bonding and early childhood literacy. We help build personal libraries of quality children's literature, creating opportunities for reading time at home. We equip participants with the skills they need to be their children's first and most influential teacher.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.1%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -35.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -71% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $121K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.