Literacy for Haiti Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010758985
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Clarkston, WA, USA
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,195
Expenses
$88,136
Assets
$27,433

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Roberta Matousek (President)

People named in this filing

  • Roberta Matousek (President)
  • Taylor Schneurle (Board Member)
  • Molly Zimmerer (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop the severely impoverished people in and around the village of Damier Haiti by increasing education commerce access to medical care hunger relief spiritual growth and support for legal immigration.

What it reported doing in 2024

Surgical Access Program Haiti Addresses the barriers to accessing surgical care at nearby Hospital Albert Schweitzer which does have a program that can provide free services.and offers free care. Mountain residents have been historically under served due to geographic isolation limited transportation low literacy unfamiliarity with institutional healthcare systems and difficulty navigating hospital intake and social assistance processes. To address these barriers LFH supported program activities implemented by OPPARH a locally based partner organization. In 2025 OPPARH employed ten local staff to identify potential surgical candidates in mountain communities assist with enrollment accompany patients and help beneficiaries navigate hospital intake social service eligibility and follow-up care at Hospital Albert Schweitzer. During the fiscal year 1,272 individuals received surgical consultation and 309 ultimately received surgical procedures free of charge.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.3%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 9 filed program accomplishments · $88K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.