Listening the Barre Integrated Health Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912002213
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Barre, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9783553501
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $123,429
- Expenses
- $123,305
- Assets
- $257,539
- Liabilities
- $122,701
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HELEN S KING (PRESIDENT)
- BEATRIZ ARROYO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- KAREN DAVIS (DIRECTOR)
- BRUCE LOCKHART (DIRECTOR)
- ELIZABETH REILLY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Listening wellness center promotes wholistic health and wellness through programming, complementary care providers and connections throughout the north central Massachusetts rural towns. Programs are available for people of all ages and abilities. Listening collaborates with community members, organizations and practitioners to offer educational resources, health and wellness programs and modalities that support whole person health and wellness.
What it reported doing in 2025
Offered rental space and health/wellness providers in a setting where people can get treatments and services locally in rural barre, ma there is a yoga studio, library, meditation space and a multitude of health and wellness programs, classes, practitioners and educational opportunities for the general public.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 60% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.09; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.6%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.8% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $122K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.