Linus Oakes Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930821381
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Roseburg, OR, USA
Phone
5416772458
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$0
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KELLY MORGAN (BOARD CHAIR/PRESIDENT & CEO MMC)

People named in this filing

  • BONNIE HUNKER (DIRECTOR/RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVE)
  • MICHELLE KRONNER (DIRECTOR/DIRECTOR VOLUNTEER SVCS MM)
  • MELONY MARSH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Linus oakes, inc. Provided independent living housing for seniors, including full range of social, cultural, and recreational events for its residents at affordable rates. Effective as of july 1, 2017, linus oakes transferred substantially all of its assets to chi living communities (chilc), an Ohio nonprofit corporation.

What it reported doing in 2018

Linus oakes, inc. Is an irc section 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation that provided independent living housing for seniors. Effective as of july 1, 2017, linus oakes transferred substantially all of its assets to chi living communities (chilc), an Ohio nonprofit corporation.chilc has substantial experience and expertise in operating and managing senior living facilities. Linus oakes and chilc do not anticipate any material change in the charitable purposes to which transferred assets are dedicated to occur as a result of the transaction. Chilc will take over and carry on linus oakes activities to benefit the community, including to provide a full range of social, cultural, and recreational events for its residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 296 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.