Linn County Library Dist 1
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 480968702
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Parker, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9138984650
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Libraries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $125,815
- Expenses
- $149,966
- Assets
- $410,608
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jason Webber (President)
- Andrew Baker (Vice-president)
People named in this filing
- Jason Webber (President)
- Andrew Baker (Vice-president)
- Carrie Sewell (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Finishing and furnishing the 40' x 60' building addition includes children's reading room, restroom, storage area, large meeting room for library programming and for community use.
What it reported doing in 2024
Finishing and furnishing our 40' x 60' addition to existing building purchasing kitchen appliances, 10 new 8 foot tables and 64 chairs. New laminate flooring throughout entire library, Purchase of 2 browser boxes (shelving units) for new children's room.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 28.2%; rating input score 28
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.74; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 50.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34% of revenue deployed · 28.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.