Lincoln Sportsmens Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465588911
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Lincoln, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4062027985
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Sports Associations &Training Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $57,051
- Expenses
- $3,897
- Assets
- $324,952
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN PATZER (PRESIDENT)
- WENDALL WEAVER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRIAN PATZER (PRESIDENT)
- WENDALL WEAVER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN JENNINGS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To encourage organized activities enjoyed by sportsmen in our community including but not limited to shooting, archery and fishing. To promote responsible and safe use of natural resources during outdoor activities. To use organized activities to educate and train attendees in safe handling and proper use of firearms, archjery and fishing equipment.
What it reported doing in 2025
To encourage organized activities enjoyed by sportsmen in our community including but not limited to shooting archery and fishing. To use organized activities to educate and train attendees in safe handling and proper use of firearms archery and fishing equipment. To assist educational organizations such as fwp hunters education fwp bow hunter education lincoln public schools 4-h clubs scouting and similar groups. To promote essentials of good sportsmanship honesty law observances and self-reliance. To encourage club members to become members of the national rifle association (nra) and other 2nd amendment organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 93.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 83.39; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.