Lincoln Rams

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922625334
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3233019587
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Football

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,651
Expenses
$67,208
Assets
$855

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANCHISCA PEITSMEYER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARIANA PAZ RENDON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • FRANCHISCA PEITSMEYER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARIANA PAZ RENDON (PRESIDENT)
  • AYME RUIZ (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The main purpose of our organization is to inspire the participants to practice ideas of health, citizenship, and character through football and cheerleading. To bring our youth closer together through the means of a common interest in fair play and fellowship. The lincoln rams working in partnership with los angeles police department community safety unit is committed to serving the ramona gardens residents, an underprivileged community as well as the surrounding communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

League registration fees uniforms training camp equipment and practicing fields were provided to 45 cheerleaders (athletes) allowing them to train for cheering during football games. Additionally they were trained to compete at a national level in cheerleading competitions ultimately placing in first place as national champions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.2%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 66.1%; rating input score 66

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.4%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -54.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.2% of revenue deployed · 66.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.