Lincoln Area Ymca Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371353644
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Lincoln, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2177353915
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,285,926
- Expenses
- $223,465
- Assets
- $1,445,513
- Liabilities
- $32,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GILBERT GANDENBERGER (President)
- JOE RYAN (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- ANGELA STOLTZENBERG (Secretary)
- DAVID HELM (Director)
- JONATHAN JORDAN (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. Activities include child care; youth development through a variety of youth sports, leadership programs and special needs programs; family events; and volunteer development for all ages.
What it reported doing in 2020
The lincoln area ymca serves over 1000 children each year in over 30 different programs throughout logan county that provide character development lessons, strong adult role models, safe, nurturing environments, healthy habits, and skill building all while having just plain fun. No child is ever turned away for inability to pay program or membership fees. Dedicated instructors are hand picked, background checked, thoroughly trained and well supervised. Volunteers are encouraged and put through the same rigorous training and background checking.as a non-facility ymca, collaborations continue to be sought out and nurtured to ensure the best possible community relations and the best possible program sites.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.2%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 54.1%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: $266.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 82.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.47; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.2% of revenue deployed · 54.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $121K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.